The term work-life balance refers to the balance needed by individuals to maintain stability and equilibrium between work and other aspects of life. Work-life balance does not mean an equal balance because it’s impossible and impractical to spend the same number of hours for work and social or personal activities. However, it means attaining a daily fulfillment in each quadrant of life: Work, Family, Friends and Self. Balance is important to maintain efficiency, effectiveness and a positive mental health; consequently, there is need to manage the times allocated for work and other aspects of life. Important aspects of life besides work include personal matters, family affairs, social events and leisure activities.

The difficulty in striking a balance between work and life is a challenge faced by a good number of people. In Canada, 58% of workers report being overloaded by their multiple roles- work, school, family, friends, physical health, volunteer and community service. In 2010, the National Health Interview Survey Occupational Health Supplement data showed that 16% of American workers had difficulty balancing work and family. These findings were more prevalent among workers in certain age groups, races, educational levels, careers and marital status. For instance, middle aged workers (30–44 years) had the highest number of individuals reporting imbalance in work and life. Additionally, non-Hispanic black workers at 19% reflected the highest rate of people who reported imbalance in work and life, compared to 16% of non-Hispanic white workers and 15% of Hispanic workers. Workers who possess a bachelor’s or advanced degree also faced greater challenges attaining a work-life balance compared to workers who possess lower educational qualifications. Based on marital status, divorced and separated workers faced higher challenges attaining work-life balance compared to married workers widowed workers, and never married workers. Workers in certain careers and industries such as agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting reported lower prevalence of work-life imbalance compared to workers in other areas. More so, professional and highly skilled workers such as legal and medical professionals reported a higher rate of work-life imbalance. On the other hand, a lower rate was observed for workers in office and administrative support fields.

The major determinants of work-life imbalance include gender, hours of work, career ambition and family composition. Differences resulting from gender are based on the fact that in most cases, men prioritize work in order to gain the financial competence to provide for their families as well as maintain their social status, whereas women in most cases prioritize their families rather than work. Long hours at work leads to an imbalance because work takes the time needed to be spent doing other important things such as attending to family needs and resting. Family composition, structure and responsibilities also influence work-life balance because families with demanding needs require members to spend less time at work in order to maintain work-life balance while families with less demanding needs allow members the flexibility to spend more time at work and still achieve some balance. For instance, parents of growing children may need to spend less time at work as they have to cater for their kids. Symptoms of work-life imbalance are loss of control, guilt about neglecting other duties, difficulty concentrating and fatigue.

Irrespective of the many challenges of achieving work-life balance, it is essential to our mental health. Therefore, it remains our individual responsibility to take control and understand our lives enough in order to maintain a healthy balance in every aspect. According to Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), tips for maintaining balance include taking breaks, setting priorities and goals, exercising, budgeting, delegating and saying no to some activities.

Antibiotic resistance, also known as antimicrobial resistance or drug resistance is a situation where microorganisms resist the effects of antibiotics designed to kill them. When antibiotics lose their effectiveness, we lose the ability to treat infections and control public health threats. Many medical procedures such as joint replacements, organ transplants, cancer therapy and treatment of chronic diseases are dependent on the possibility to combat infections using antibiotics. Therefore, it is important that these antibiotics retain their effectiveness to ensure the success of these procedures and treatments.

The discovery of Antibiotics remains one of the wonders and breakthroughs of the 20th century. In 1928, Penicillin- the first ever commercial antibiotic was discovered by Alexander Fleming to combat micro-organisms. Subsequently, many other antibiotics have been discovered and used as drugs in the treatment, management and cure of several microbial infections and diseases. The effectiveness and importance of antibiotics cannot be overstressed; however, antimicrobial resistance has been a constant hindrance to their effectiveness.  The unique and unusual genetic capabilities and aptitude of microbes takes advantage of the abuse and overuse of antibiotics. These organisms use resistance genes and horizontal gene transmission to develop several mechanisms of resistance for antibiotics developed and used clinically, agriculturally and otherwise.

Antibiotic resistance occurs when microbes develop the capacity to survive drugs designed to kill them. Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant germs difficult and sometimes impossible, to treat. They often require longer hospital stays or visits, additional follow-ups and other expensive alternatives. Antibiotics have been abused in so many ways including using them when not necessary, overusing them in treating all types of infections, taking too much of them and imbuing them into different agricultural systems, animals, and food products. These various forms of abuse have unlocked the potential for bacteria to evolve into resistant strains that can survive antibiotic that previously could destroy them. Microbes- like most creatures will always find survival strategies and device innovative ways to resist new drugs. In fact, more organisms share their resistance with one another, making it harder to deal with them. To achieve a complete restoration of therapeutic use and effectiveness of antibiotics, there is a need to reduce and end antibiotic resistance. Specifically, one way to achieve this is through creative approaches in the discovery of new antibiotics and their controlled introduction to treatment.

Antibiotic resistance affects people at any stage of life; it also affects health and agriculture- making it one of the most critical public health problems in the world. In the US, about 2 million people are infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and at least 23,000 people die as a result annually. People at greater risk of these infections are especially those already suffering chronic illnesses.

Health insurance is a significant concept in global health due to its relevance in every part of the world. It is broadly described as insurance that covers all or part of an individual’s expenses resulting from disability, ill health or injury. Health insurance considers and calculates each individual’s probability of incurring medical expenses; spreads it over the same probability for a group of individuals and then estimates the overall risk of health care and health system expenses in that group. Subsequently, a routine financing structure – usually a monthly premium, is developed by the insurer for the group to raise the funds needed to pay for the specified health care benefits in the insurance contract or agreement. Hence, health insurance is not really free health care; it is a system where individuals pay for healthcare as a society- by making different degrees of contributions thus reducing the overall cost and risk of being bankrupted by medical bills. Most of the time, these benefits are administered by a central organization such as the government, business agency or not-for-profit group.

The need for an effective and efficient health insurance plan cannot be overemphasized, and is crucial to maintaining a healthy world. One major advantage and aim of health insurance is to uphold the global health goal of promoting equity in health care- given that the right to health is a fundamental human right. This ensures that individuals and families who may be living in poverty can still get the health services and care they need, even though they would otherwise not be able to afford it. Other pros of health insurance include promoting affordable healthcare while balancing out-of-pocket costs, increasing safe and great quality healthcare options, encouraging innovation and competition in the health sector, improving access to healthcare, expanding service and choices of care options, encouraging individuals to seek medical care and strengthening the healthcare workforce to meet the diverse needs of patients.

Despite the many benefits, one significant drawback of health insurance is that sometimes, it is not flexible and doesn’t cover all or part of the costs of very expensive medical services and care. This means that despite having an insurance plan, people can still go bankrupt if they suffer long-term ill-health that is quite expensive to manage and is not covered by their insurance agreement.

In Europe, nearly all the countries have universal health care (UHC), although there may be small variations across countries. Europe’s UHC is often referred to as “free health care” system due to its effectiveness and efficiency, even for foreigners. However- typical of health insurance, it is not exactly free. Europe’s health insurance system is delivered through a variety of national systems which are publicly funded through taxation.

In North America, health insurance is broad and diverse across the different countries. In the US for example, private and social insurance programs such as Medicare amasses resources and spreads the financial risk of medical expenses across the population. There are many health insurance plans in the US- including private and public plans which provide different levels of financial protection and scope of coverage. Irrespective of the various plans, over 40% of insured Americans reported that their health insurance plans did not sufficiently meet their needs. Canada’s universal health-care system is publicly provided and covers most health-care services as long as an individual possess a valid government-issued health card. This universal health-care system is funded by taxes, differs by province or territory and may vary in the medical costs and conditions covered.

In Africa, Nigeria has a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) which operates under a prepayment system known as capitation. Registered members receive a monthly bill irrespective of whether or not that person used the NHIS’s services. The amount paid is dependent social factors such as income which promotes equity in the receipt of health services. The objective of NHIS in Nigeria is to reduce socioeconomic barriers to achieving universal access to health care and service. The downsides of NHIS include lack of organization, high financial cost, poor health care service and infrastructure, uneven distribution of hospitals and healthcare professionals.

Conflict can be described as a form of dissonance or disharmony arising within or among groups as a result of differences and disagreements regarding beliefs or actions. When conflict arises within a group, it is termed intragroup conflict while conflict among two or more groups is called intergroup conflict. Conflict usually involves violence, interpersonal discord, and often follows a particular course. In the face of conflicts, routine group interaction is interrupted due to differences of opinion or other types of disagreements between members. These threaten the unity of the group- and may cause separation, alliances or violence. The effects of conflict on human health can be broad and devastating- including:

• Direct physical impact or injury from fighting
• Indirect morbidity and mortality as a result of collapse or deterioration of public health
• Psychological and emotional effects of conflicts which have long-term effects on quality of life, disability, and survival.

Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is a case at hand, vividly illustrating how conflict cripples the healthcare system and consequently, the health of the populace. The country which was once known for its network of clinics and quality health care professionals has been experiencing political and economic downfall for the past three decades. Currently in DRC, hospitals and clinics have zero to limited qualified healthcare professionals as well as insufficient equipment, medicine and other medical supplies. Life expectancy is below average and government expenditure on health per capita remains one of the lowest in the world. Consequently, about 70% of the population lack or have limited access to health care. Malnutrition rate- both chronic and acute has remained over 43% for up to 2 decades and is reflected in the stunted growth and wasted look of many children. Additionally, approximately 39% of younger women anemic and about 14% are underweight. Needless to say, infectious diseases remain a major health problem with malaria resulting in an estimated 40% of outpatient visits, and causing nearly 1 in 5 deaths of children below 5 years of age. DRC has the 2^nd and 6^th highest global cases of malaria and Tuberculosis respectively, singlehandedly accounting for 11% of the global burden of malaria in 2013.

Improving the health care system is essential to improving the health of Congolese citizens. DRC has recently made significant progress following enhanced leadership and investments in priority health issues by the government and international partners. In general, the number of children between 12 and 23 months who received all recommended vaccines moved up from 31% in 2007 to 45% in 2013. From the year 2007 to 2013, the mortality for children below the age of 5 reduced from 148 to 104 deaths per 1,000 live births. The country has also been polio-free for over three years- a worthwhile progress given the conflict in the country.

Spirituality is a universal human experience which acknowledges the existence of a spiritual being- a higher power that is believed by many to give life a meaning; bring forth hope for an after-life and offers peace of mind or general wellbeing of the soul. It refers to all efforts to discover purpose and destiny in relation to a sacred or significant being which may have a secular, religious, philosophical, humanist or personal facet. More so, spirituality and spiritual activities are rooted in values, beliefs, practices and philosophies that may impact peoples’ cognition, emotion, and behavior. Most people connect spiritually through religion and religious objects viewed as sacred or through a deep sense of awareness and consciousness. Others feel connected to spirituality through music, arts, values, moral principles or nature. It is believed that spirituality is related to- and in fact, plays a role in quality of life, wellbeing, health and wellness. However, the exact means by which spirituality relates to health unclear; except for the wide-held belief that the spirit, soul, mind and body are connected, and that the wellness of any one of them seems to affect the other significantly. It is believed that spirituality is beneficial for health and healing possibly because it teaches abstinence from unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and excessive drinking.

According to some research, there exists a link between beliefs and sense of well-being. More specifically, positive beliefs and energy as well as the comfort, and confidence conferred by spirituality through religious acts such as mindfulness meditation, yoga, rituals, prayer and religious activities promote healing, contribute to general well-being and may improve mental health. They may also prevent some health problems, promote a feeling of wellness and help one cope better with ill-health, stress or loss.

Mind-body medical research, a field that focuses on the complex relationship between social and spiritual elements and their influence on health and disease, involves investigating and promoting positive spiritual coping strategies used by patients to manage stress and disease. Despite the several published studies examining the connection between spirituality and health, outcomes have remained multifaceted and complicated with methodological controversy due to confounders including specific attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, emotions and practices unique to individuals.

Research suggests that individuals who participate in spiritual activities or acknowledge that spirituality is a source of strength and comfort are healthier and may possess greater healing capabilities. Additionally, some studies report positive associations between spirituality and life expectancy, decreased rates of stroke, cancer, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, drug abuse, suicide, and general mortality. To improve the benefits of spirituality to health, one must identify and spend time in the activities that foster a sense of inner peace, comfort, strength, love, and connection. Some of these activities may include selfless community service, volunteering, praying, meditating, singing devotional songs, reading religious books, watching inspirational videos, taking nature walks, having quiet times, thinking, yoga, playing sports, fellowshipping with people of the same faith, travelling and attending religious services. Noteworthy, it is important to share one’s beliefs with his/her physician, especially when being treated for a specific illness. This is because spiritual activities may influence feelings, understanding, decisions and adherence to instructions or medications in medical situations. Due to the complexity of spirituality-health relationship, an interdisciplinary perspective is required for further research and clinical care

Undoubtedly, commitment to the global prevention and control of HIV/AIDS pandemic continues to increase with great significance in recent years. However, the virus has remained persistent in spreading- almost to the point of ridiculing the much effort and work put into its control. According to a report by UNAIDS, an estimated 40 million people were living with HIV infection or disease by the end of 2005; a notable increase compared to the about 35 million people living with the virus in 2001. Additionally, about 5 million new HIV infections and 3 million AIDS deaths occurred in 2005- much more in both cases when compared to the previous years.

Despite these discouraging statistics about the rapid spread of HIV, some countries have achieved significant progress through successful projects and programs in reducing this spread and transmission. The much effort and corresponding progress of HIV prevention and control is demonstrated by the many success stories and programs in different countries and regions across the world:

• Thailand’s 100% condom program
• Uganda’s remarkable decrease in HIV prevalence
• Tanzania’s community-based management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs)
• Development and effective use of highly sensitive and specific HIV screening tests, which have nearly eliminated blood infection in the developed world and in some parts of the developing world
• Introduction of anti-retroviral drugs (ART) in the late 1980s which commenced a revolution in the management of HIV that can be compared to the advent of penicillin in the 1940s
• Administration of ART to mothers during labor and to newborns post-partum which reduces the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) by about 47%
• Use of combination ART, which is much more effective than mono-therapy
• Decrease in the cost of antiretroviral therapy in developing countries, prompting its expansion through the public sector

Good as the many success stories and achievements in HIV/AIDS prevention and control seem, a few woes, challenges or drawbacks are not lacking. Some of these obstacles include:

• Viral mutation: Mutations in HIV type 1 are a major impediment to the achievement of successful treatment and the development of vaccines. Although treatment has made long-term suppression of HIV a reality, drug resistance, drug toxicity, drug penetration and poor adherence to therapy are some of the most significant challenges that hinder cure and eradication of the virus.
• Lack of access to services: Irrespective of the progress in treatment of HIV, global efforts have not proved adequate to control the spread of the pandemic or to extend the lives of those infected. The desired level of success has not yet been achieved because many people who could benefit from available HIV control strategies and services; including treatment, lack access to them.
• Lack of Rigorous Evaluations: In addition to the above mentioned challenges, lack of reliable evidence to guide the improvement and selection of interventions for specific areas or populations has remained a barrier to effective HIV/AIDS control.
• Funding cuts: UNAIDS and the US-based Kaiser Family Foundation report that international AIDS funding was stagnant at $7.6 billion in 2009- the first year ever without an increase. More so, the funding for 2010 further declined, showing an actual drop from 2009 levels, the first significant decline in AIDS donor funding since the beginning of the pandemic.

It is important to continue studying and understanding the factors that place individuals and populations at risk of HIV as well to identify safe, acceptable, accessible and cost-effective interventions that can be implemented and evaluated for improvement. It is only through a continued commitment to HIV research, prevention, treatment and control that this generation can conquer the HIV pandemic, and declare it history.

A depressed economy is one which suffers a severe, continued, long-standing, recession in economic activities resulting from unforeseen rapid rise in the value of a unit of account. An economic depression is an uncommon and extreme form of recession categorized by duration, unusual rise in rates of unemployment, employees’ resistance to nominal wage cuts, long-lasting credit contracts such as mortgages, decrease in credit availability due to financial crisis and bank failures, price deflation, decreased output as consumers reduce and productions and investments decline, increased rate of bankruptcies including sovereign debt defaults, reductions in international trade and commerce, anxiety and volatile fluctuations in currency value. These reflect the fact that money, which is the root of the economy, essentially has a market like food or cars which has a specific value at any point in time depending on the existing economic conditions. From a purely economic standpoint, economic depression is defined by two factors; decline in real GDP exceeding 10%, or recession lasting 2 or more years.

Similar to medical depression, economic depression has broad and widespread social, economic and psychological effects. It leads to a dramatic reduction in employment, human potential and productivity as well as cripples a country’s output, efficiency and success. As a matter of fact, loss of employment, being one of the major concerns during an economic crisis, has a causal association with mental health problems such as depression. Depression then reduces the chances of re-employment and reintegration into an already stressed economy and ultimately leads to increased debts for the unemployed. Existing data from research show that financial hardship, typically resulting from a depressed economy, can also lead to increased mental health problems and anxiety, rent and mortgage debt, consumer debt and significant deterioration in quality of life and well-being. Following re-employment after economic depression, the labor force may experience reduction in independence, self-direction, locus of control and competence due to loss of skills during depression.

Although some individuals remain employed during an economic depression, they are not exempt from the consequences of the crisis. Constant anxiety due to job insecurity complicates existing depression and affects the productivity of the working force. There is also stress resulting from increased workload since independence and specified job duties are threatened by the contraction of the workforce. Consequently, the ambitions of individuals to pursue opportunities for employment are limited by less choices and more rigorous job requirements in the labor market. All these effects of a depressed economy ultimately affect nations and global health in general.

Humanitarian crisis can be explained as a remarkable and disastrous event or chain of events that threaten the health, safety and well-being of a group of people, community or the public at large. It is an emergency which prevents a population or large group of people from accessing basic needs such as food, water, healthcare, clothing and shelter. A crisis may result from an internal or external factor or differences, and typically occurs over a large area of land. These events often require local, national and international responses as the immediate community may be unprepared to handle such situations. There are different factors that cause or lead to humanitarian crises; consequently, response to each crisis should be targeted towards the particular sectors affected as well as meet the unique needs of the victims involved. Humanitarian crises may result from natural disasters, man-made catastrophes or a combination of complex emergencies, and may cause short, temporal, long-term or permanent damages. Some common examples of events categorized as humanitarian crisis include: armed conflicts, pollution, epidemics, flooding, pandemics, wildfires, famine and natural disasters including hurricanes and earthquakes.

The consequences of humanitarian crises are detrimental to health and leads to increased movement of people which may eventually result in refugee crisis if not addressed or handled properly. For these reasons, national and international agencies such as Ministries of Health, WHO and UNICEF need to assist in the rectification of these tragedies. Till date, the magnitude of the international humanitarian response has remained inadequate and unsatisfactory as up to 2 billion people in over 40 countries worldwide suffer several challenges- especially health-related, from crisis conditions. A recent study published in The Lancet titled “Health in Humanitarian Crisis” revealed that large-scale humanitarian crises are constantly ongoing in many African and Asian countries. Implicated countries include Syria, Afghanistan, Central African Republic, DR Congo, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, and Yemen. After assessing the evidence base for health interventions in humanitarian crises, the study found that there are significant variations in the quantity and quality of evidence available. This reflects the lack of emergency preparedness and limitation of health interventions accessible in times of emergencies and crises.

Noteworthy, many lessons have been learned from past failed responses and lack of recommendations to improve emergency preparedness (EP) and crisis response (CR). Therefore, it is important prioritize EP and CR as well as align humanitarian interventions with development programs, ensure the availability and accessibility of timely and robust health information and to make health interventions more efficient, effective, and sustainable during humanitarian crisis. According to WHO, focused and intensive preparation is fundamental to improved response systems. Identified priorities include health assessments, coordinated response strategies, joint action to tackle suffering and reduce deaths; early identification of response gaps and renovation of local systems that are essential for better health

Universal health coverage (UHC) is based on the fact that all humans have a right to health. It is a movement to make sure that everyone receives the health care and services that they need, at the time which they need it, in the appropriate way or quality and without suffering any financial hardship or going bankrupt while paying for them. To achieve this, it is important that the public sector, which is governments, fulfill their legal obligations to realize this human right to health. In view of UHC, it is therefore important to assess and evaluate the growing engagement and involvement of private parties in the health sector because of their reputation and mission to maximize and prioritize profits and gains. More so, private sectors are not under legal obligations to provide subsidized care or public goods; they may also not have sufficient funds and incentives to accommodate externalities that affect the availability, timeliness, accessibility and quality of health care services.

The engagement of the private sector in the delivery of healthcare includes a broad range of activities carried out by various non-governmental players. These players may include independent multi-national companies, nongovernmental organizations, and nonprofit entities. Undeniably, these private or non-state sectors, including international donors, non-governmental organizations, for-profit providers and traditional healers, play important roles in health care financing and delivery, especially in developing countries. In this way, private sectors have remained useful and their resources have been harnessed in furthering UHC and other public and global health goals through public private engagements or partnerships.  Though, this may present some challenges in terms of the ethics, efficiency, safety, effectiveness and cost of health services- given the fact that they’re set-up for profit.

These partnerships are complex and take a variety of forms. It is important for governments in developing countries to strengthen positive private partnerships and take advantage of them to achieve UHC since the lack of resources hinders them to solely deliver and finance healthcare unlike developed countries where the governments mostly fulfill this role. Consequently, the health systems of most developing countries are ‘mixed’- private sectors are integrated with public health systems, with market systems often playing the leading role. Unfortunately, in such systems and countries, insufficient government funding and poor regulation of the private sectors continue to undermine the equity and efficiency of the health system, healthcare and services in general.

In global health, there are many successful partnerships with the private sector that help save and improve lives- according to United States Agency for International Development (USAID). These partnerships facilitate additional funding, contribute unique expertise and help scale impact. USAID emphasizes collaboration, co-design, and co-financing with private sectors, as the drivers of capital markets, to achieve a faster, inclusive growth in global health.

Global self-esteem is defined as a general or overall sense of worthiness possessed by people as a nation. According to Maslow’s self-actualization theory, self-esteem in addition to the need for achievement, competence, independence, and respect, is fourth in the hierarchy of needs.  Self-esteem, being a fundamental human need and motive has been broadly investigated in social science research as well as in clinical, developmental and counseling psychology. Results from experiential studies recognize and emphasize the fact that self-esteem is one of the most significant concepts that explains and relates to several behavioral, health, economic and social outcomes of life and realities in a nation.

More specifically, some studies identify self-esteem as a significant determinant of health and emotional well-being, such that individuals with high self-esteem have greater emotional stability and are better at managing their emotions compared to others. Additionally, a 2006 New Zealand longitudinal research followed some adolescents and found that those with low self-esteem had poor physical and psychological health, poor economic prospect and increased chances of engaging in crime. Concurrently, high self-esteem has been associated with negative psychological and behavioral outcomes such as egoism, aggression, narcissism and violence.

The results of low and high self-esteem in individuals are reflected in the nation’s health and invariably, in global health. To avoid the dark side of self-esteem which is caused by low confidence and over-confidence or too high self-esteem, individuals and nations must strike a balance by possessing a healthy self-esteem. According to research in 2005 by David P. Schmitt and Juri Allik, self-esteem varies vastly in levels around the world.  These researchers used the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale to analyze data of about 17,000 people in 53 different countries. The results showed that the top five countries with the highest levels self-esteem are Serbia, Chile, Israel, Peru and Estonia while the countries with the lowest levels of self-esteem are Japan, Hong Kong, Bangladesh, Czech Republic and Taiwan.

The understanding of self-esteem was similar across these countries and in general: self-esteem was higher in countries that regard men and women equally; levels of self-esteem were not linked to life expectancy, literacy or standard of living; individualist and collectivist countries had lower and higher levels of self-esteem respectively; higher self-esteem was directly proportional to lower levels of anxiety; men had higher self-esteem than women and self-esteem increases as age increases. Another study examined the impact of national differences in self-esteem on suicide rates using data from the International Sexuality Description Project (ISDP). Results showed that suicide is particularly common in nations with comparatively low levels of self‐esteem; this association was consistent across sex and age but independent of economic affluence, social status, individualism, well‐being, and neuroticism.